|
Can we defuse the global warming time bomb? ( Page: Previous Next ) The Lessons of history Over the past few million years, the Earth's climate has swung repeatedly between ice ages and warm interglacial periods. Twenty thousand years ago, an ice sheet covered Canada, reaching as far south as Seattle, Iowa and New York City. More than a mile thick, the ice sheet, should it return, would tower over and crush to dust the tallest buildings in its path.
Figure 2. Record of atmospheric temperature, CO2 and CH4 extracted from Antarctic ice core (Reference 2f).
The next ice age will never come, however, unless humans desert the planet. As we shall see, the small forces that drove millennial climate changes are now overwhelmed by human forcings. A small fraction of the greenhouse gases that civilization emits is sufficient to avert global cooling. The problem is now the opposite: human forcings are driving the planet toward a warmer climate. Our best guide for how much the Earth's climate will change is provided by the record of how the Earth responded in the past to natural forcings.
![]()
Figure 3. Climate during the last ice age, which peaked 20,000 years ago, was dramatically different than it is today. Global climate forcing was about 6 1/2 W/m2 less than in the current interglacial period. This forcing maintained a planet 5 °C colder than today. (Drawing from Reports to the Nation on Our Changing Planet: Our Changing Climate, Fall 1997.)
The paleodata provide another important insight. Changes in the Earth's orbit are an instigator of climate change, but they operate by altering atmosphere and surface properties and thus the planetary energy balance. These atmosphere and surface properties are now influenced more by humans than by our planet's orbital variations. Greenhouse gases are increasing today and glaciers and ice sheets are melting back. The old maxim, that the Earth is heading toward a new ice age, has been rendered void by the power of modern technology. |
|
Box 2: But what about...
|
|
"Last winter was so cold! I don't notice any global warming!" Global warming is ubiquitous, but its magnitude so far is only about 0.6 °C (1 °F). Day-to-day weather fluctuations are about 6 °C (10 °F). Even averaged over a season, this natural (year-to-year) variability is about 1 1/4 °C (2 °F), so global warming does not make every season warmer than it was a few decades ago. However, global warming already makes the probability of a warmer than "normal" season about 60%, rather than the 30% that prevailed in 19501980 (Plate XV in Reference 13).
"I read that satellites have measured global cooling, not warming." That was the story a few years ago, but as the satellite record has lengthened and has been studied more carefully, it has shifted to indicate warming. The discrepancy with surface measurements is disappearing. The primary issue now is: "How fast is the warming?" "The surface warming is mainly urban 'heat island' effects near weather stations." Not so. As predicted, the largest warming is found in remote regions such as central Asia and Alaska. The largest areas of surface warming are over the ocean, far from urban locations (see maps at http://www.giss.nasa.gov/data/update/gistemp). Temperature profiles in the solid earth, at hundreds of boreholes around the world, imply a warming of continental surfaces of between 0.5 and 1 °C over the past century. "The warming of the past century is just a natural 'rebound' from the 'little ice age'." Any rebound from the European little ice age, which peaked in 16501750, would have been largely complete by the 20th century. Indeed, the natural long-term climate trend is toward a colder climate. "Isn't human-made global warming saving us from the next ice age?" Yes, but the gases that we have added to the atmosphere are already far more than needed for that purpose. "Climate variations are mainly due to solar variability." The sun does flicker and the 'little ice age' may have been caused, at least in part, by reduced solar output. Best estimates are that the sun contributed about one quarter of global warming between 1850 and 2000. Climate forcing by greenhouse gases is now larger than that by the sun, and the greenhouse forcing is increasing monotonically, whereas no significant long-term trend is expected for the sun. The sun may contribute to future climate change, but it is no longer the dominant player. "Global warming will be negligible if the 'iris effect,' suggested by Richard Lindzen, is valid." This proposed negative climate feedback (in which it is supposed that tropical clouds adjust to allow more heat radiation to escape to space when the Earth gets warmer) has been discredited in specific tests against in situ and satellite data. More generally, any feedbacks that exist in the real world are included in the empirical measures of climate sensitivity provided by the history of the Earth. This history shows that the Earth's climate is sensitive to forcings, with a sensitivity similar to that of climate models. |
|
Climate forcing agents today The largest change in climate forcings in recent centuries has been caused by human-made greenhouse gases (see Box 3). These gases absorb the Earth's infrared (heat) radiation. Because they make the atmosphere more opaque in the infrared region, the Earth's radiation to space emerges from a higher level in the atmosphere, where it is colder. The energy radiated to space is thus reduced, causing a temporary planetary energy imbalance, with the Earth absorbing more energy from the sun than it radiates to space. Thus the Earth gradually warms. Because of the large heat capacity of the oceans, the Earth requires about a century to return most of the way to equilibrium; however, more forcings may be added before this equilibrium is achieved.
|
|
Box 3: Climate forcing agents in the industrial era (18502000) (W/m2). |
Error bars are partly subjective 1 σ (standard deviation) uncertainties.
|
|